Sympathy for the Devil

(Page 2 of 3)

 
 
"Uni," by Bobby Beausoleil, courtesy of Clair Obscur Gallery
 
After gaining insight into the 60's occult scene of which Anger was one of the ringleaders, I went on to pick up the more journalistically mainstream Joan Didion's essay book, "The White Album," another tome that delves into the psyche of the late 60's. I call this period, 'the bridge era,' and in one way or other believe that we are at this very moment experiencing another 'bridge era.' Just as the 60's kids came out of the product-reverent and superficial 50's, my generation has come out of the label-conscious, shallow 80's. The 60's activists, like The Weathermen, fought their battles violently and radically.
 
Today's generation uses information technology and propaganda as its alternative fuel for revolution. Some cases in point are political pranksters "The Yes Men," and the anti-globalization magazine Ad Busters. Both generations have been forced to endure a war on foreign soil that many feel is 'the wrong war.' Both wars have been marked by massive protests. In both cases, the protests were ignored by the government. In some ways, I feel that today's America stands on the brink of another "1969." So I have become fascinated with this cornerstone year, its 'bridge era,' and the paths of its counterculture kingpins.
About the same time that I was starting to delve more in-depth into this subject, I was approached, at an art opening at the Clair Obscur Gallery in Los Angeles, by the gallery's director. The creative space--in the middle of a rundown neighborhood near LACC, which is fast becoming an edgy arts neighborhood-has begun to build a reputation for hosting fairly controversial shows. I met the gallery director at a party for "Legs," a book that a fetish photographer friend of mine, Dave Naz had just released.
 
Clair Obscur's next show was to focus on rare images of Sharon Tate-including both a personal photo shoot by Polanski, as well as some gruesome police photos taken at the site of the murders. It was next show opening on March 5, explained the gallery director that he was interested in me covering. It would center on 21 paintings by Beausoleil from prison. I agreed, and he arranged for me to take the collect call from Eastern Oregon Correctional Institution in Pendleton, Ore. on Thursday, February 10, 2005, at the gallery. Beausoleil had been transferred there under the Interstate Compact Agreement after an early leg in San Quentin State Prison in Calif. The story had piqued the interest of my editor at Salon, who agreed to run it as a dispassionate Q&A.
Prior to our phone interview, I thought a lot about my subject; first as a person, then as a counterculture figure; lastly as a murderer. Born in the upper-middle-class suburb of Santa Barbara, Calif. on November 6, 1947, Robert Kenneth Beausoleil spent part of his early teenhood in juvenile hall and reform school. It was during his time in the latter at Los Prietos Boys Camp, a reform school in Santa Barbara--he told writer Michael Moynihan in the book "Apocalypse Culture II"-that he expressed his artistic ability, with the encouragement of his peers, by drawing pictures of nude women.
 
Flowing with the nomadic rock n' roll zeitgeist, he eventually made his way up to the Bay Area in his late teens and became entrenched in the legendary San Francisco underground music scene. He even ended up doing some odd vocals on Frank Zappa's first album with the Mothers of Invention, "Freakout!" (1966), as one of the people chanting on, "Help, I'm a rock" and 'Who are the Brain Police?"
Most noteworthy among his forays was a stint on rhythm guitar with The Grassroots, which would evolve into Arthur Lee's seminal psychedelic band Love. Apparently, Lee (who also did time in prison, for illegal possession and use of a firearm) later moved to Laurel Canyon-hub of the bohemian counterculture scene in the late 60's and early 70's. From the general local hearsay at the water cooler known as the Laurel Canyon Country Store, it seemed as though Beausoleil may have lived with him there (à-la "Kato" Kaelin), at the top of the canyon on Mulhulland Drive.
 
As an arts and style writer, most of my topics-albeit 'cutting edge'-had never so literally connected to that expression, as with fresh-faced knife-wielding assassin, Beausoleil. Most of my subjects have pushed the envelope in that they have challenged social perceptions through their creative work. I have written about bio-artists that use genetic material in their pieces, as well as performance artists that show up in public spaces impromptu dressed as medics. I have also written about fluffy things like the Playboy Bunny reunion, and the moustache trend. I associate more with being a writer who is personally interested in creative people, than with being a fair and balanced journalist. But the moment I wrote my first article for the Los Angeles Times, I mysteriously ceased being labeled a writer, and had the serious and limiting title 'journalist,' imposed upon me.
 
And actually, as I am writing this one week after Hunter S. Thompson's death by suicide, I feel the need to be one of those in my generation willing to carry his torch. I don't believe that the concept fair and balanced really exists in journalism-not in these times when the expression has been reduced to being the slogan for an ultra-conservative news network. I would rather be honest with myself and embrace my biases. I decided that I was not going to ask Beausoleil to recount that night when he committed murder. I wanted to approach him in the same way I had approached all my other subjects. Through my words, he would be an artist first, a human being second and (again) a murderer last.
 
I poured over the Moynihan interview. It not only recounted Beausoleil's life story but his sexual life in prison. The tales of attempted rape scratched the surface-touched upon something society is perversely fascinated with, but the least interesting part of his story, in my opinion. I was drawn to Beausoleil's attempt to describe an intimacy with himself and in the sacred act of experiencing sexual sensations of the Tantric variety. He spoke of connecting his sexuality to his drawings-creating, in my mind, an act of lovemaking for the posthuman age. As a product of the objectifying 80's and its concomitant angry, divisive sexuality, I was intrigued by what sounded like a pure synergy with the many parts of the self. It seemed that, despite his personal monsters and his loathsome environment, he had found a way to tap into the very precept of intimacy (something I had feared via feelings of sickly-sweet revulsion from the moment I came of age).
 
Subjectively speaking I was fascinated by Beausoleil's rather adolescent erotic artwork from the 80's. The work depicted his, "pagan sensibilities," in the form of delicate, small-breasted nymphets (as Humbert Humbert called them in Vladimir Nabakov's Lolita). They were fairies juxtaposed alongside fetishistically isolated phalluses. "[They] play off the Aphrodite/ heroine's archetype," Beausoleil divulged. One, "Cupid in Trouble," seemed to be a tongue-in-cheek jab at himself, using his own nickname. It shows a 'goddess' who has been pierced by Cupid's arrow, taking the mischief-maker over her knee for a paddling. Again, that Yin-Yang sensation befell me, and I became enchanted, even a bit obsessed by the drawings. At once adolescent and adult, they resonated with my own sexuality.
 
"Art became a replacement for making love with a woman," he told me. In 1982, he married his wife Barbara, who had contacted him after having seen him on a television interview for a Sacramento, Calif. news station. After exchanging letters, "We met in mid-1981. She came to visit and asked me to marry her. We've been married 23 years." When I heard Beausoleil speak tenderly of her interest in goddess literature, after having seen a photo of her on her web site, I was sure that he had succumb to the archetype prescribed to him by his rough environment-the understanding, unconditionally loving mother goddess.
 
The early part of the couple's marriage included the privilege of conjugal visits, but according to Beausoleil, "That ended about 12 years ago when they made some changes in California." He explained that the couple shared a spiritual union; that it was impossible to have a traditional marriage under the circumstances. He said that theirs was a bond beyond traditional description, but that he was also 'close' to quite a few other women on the outside. The alternative-to place his focus on his daily surroundings-was, it goes without saying, unthinkable.
PAGE 3 OF 3
 
 
BACK TO PAGE 1
 
Copyright © 2005 Shana Ting Lipton
home >
toc >
info >
news >
blog >
clips >
links >
boutique >
contact >
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Copyright © 2008 Shana Ting Lipton